Parashat Tzav

Words for Shabbat - A community blog for this week's parashah

Parashat Tzav

Between the Eternal Fire and the Eternal Lamp

 
By Rivi Dror
 

The Book of Leviticus, which we began reading last week, is also known as "The Law of the Priests." The book deals with the service of the Tabernacle: the activities, duties, and roles of the priests, as well as the concept of holiness and the role of the Jewish people as a holy nation.


In last week’s parashah, Vayikra, we read about the types of sacrifices an individual could offer; whereas in this week’s parashah, Tzav, we encounter the laws governing the priests" service in the Tabernacle and their daily duties. The morning in the Tabernacle begins with the cleansing of the altar of all the remains of the sacrifices that were burned on it during the night. One priest is chosen to remove the "trumat ha-dashan,” a small portion of the burnt remains, and place them at the foot of the altar, on the eastern side, facing the rising sun. Afterward, the priests clean the rest of the ashes and carry them outside the camp, to a pure place.


Right from the very first task of the day, a dual movement becomes apparent: there is manure that is brought in—and manure that is removed. There are aspects of the past that we choose to keep close, as a memento and a reminder, and there are aspects of the past that we must clear away to make room for a new beginning. The addition of fertilizer and the removal of fertilizer point to an inner tension: every day is part of a chain of days, of tradition, of generations; and at the same time, it is also a new day, seeking to begin "with a clean slate," with renewed strength and will.


After the grain offering has been prepared, the wood is arranged on the altar, and the fire is kindled in preparation for the morning burnt offering. A fire burns constantly on the altar:


“A fire shall be kept burning on the altar—it shall not go out.” (Leviticus 6:6) On the day the Tabernacle was dedicated, fire came down from heaven and took hold of the altar before the eyes of the people. From that moment on, the fire on the altar is a continuation of that revelation, but the responsibility for it passes to humanity. For even a fire of divine origin requires hands to tend it, to feed it, and to ensure it does not go out. Therefore, there are always glowing embers in the corner of the altar—a fire that must burn constantly.


The eternal flame is a fire of action. It cooks, transforms, and consumes matter. It is part of daily life, of physical, repetitive work—the kind that can sometimes become an automatic habit.
Precisely for this reason, kindling the fire on the altar every day requires the priest to remain fully present in his actions—not merely to perform them, but also to pay attention to what is happening. When an action is performed out of habit, without paying attention, it does not merely take place; it also accumulates.


Every fire leaves behind ashes; every action leaves behind debris. This debris is not merely waste. The act of clearing away the debris teaches us that there are things from the past worth preserving and keeping close by, as a reminder. Clearing away the debris reminds us that not everything is meant to be kept; there are also things to be discarded, to make way for a new beginning.


To tell them apart, you need light.
As we gaze upon the eternal flame, we are reminded of the eternal lamp described in the parashah Tetzaveh in the Book of Exodus.
"And you shall commandthe Israelites, and they shall bring to you pure, crushed olive oil for the light, to keep the lamp burning continually" (Exodus 27:20). As part of the preparation of the Tabernacle, the people are commanded to bring pure olive oil to "keep the lamp burning continually." The eternal lamp burns inside the Tent of Meeting, within. It is the westernmost lamp among the branches of the menorah. The priests must ensure that it never goes out, and every evening the other lamps of the menorah are lit from this one. What is the connection between the eternal fire and the eternal lamp? Why must both burn constantly?


The eternal flame is at work in the world, transforming it. It sets a process in motion—but also leaves a remnant behind.
The fertilizer reminds us that life is not just about what we do, but also about what remains with us from those actions.
And the eternal flame—the light that burns within—allows us to return to what remains, to find meaning in it, and to carry on even when the path is not entirely clear.
The light of the eternal flame is a light that does not burn out, but rather accompanies us.

 

In these days when reality itself is ablaze, and our daily routines are repeatedly shattered, it seems as though fire is all around us. We need a light to illuminate our choice: what from these days will remain with us, and how we will carry what remains. That same light will also enable us to see the good in people, what still functions and is good in our reality, and the light of faith. It is important to know that if the eternal flame goes out, it is rekindled only from the eternal flame itself.


Perhaps we can learn from this that even the gentlest light sometimes needs a spark that comes from action, from the world, from encounters with others. "We are with you, you are not alone"—this is not merely a slogan we shouted to the mothers of the kidnapped, but it continues to be spoken and cried out at other demonstrations where the public seeks to support and empower those whose voices are not heard enough.


May we know how to keep the fire burning: to act, to participate, to be part of it; and may we also know how to tend the candle: to shine, to see, to discern; and may we know, anew each day, what to take from the ashes and what to let go of—and may we have the strength for all of this.


Shabbat Shalom!

Picture of ריבי דרור

Rivi Dror

Rivi is a rabbi in the Israeli House of Prayer community, lives in Pardes Hanna, and is the mother of two daughters. .

Leviticus

Words for Shabbat - A community blog for this week's parashah

The Book of Leviticus

Words for Shabbat

""Turn it over and turn it over, be absorbed in it" is what is said about the Torah: Study the Torah from all sides, because each time a different and new aspect and interpretation of the Torah can be revealed. This year we are renewing ourselves with a new section in the newsletter: "Words for Shabbat" - each week we will publish in the newsletter and on the Beit Tefilla website a Torah passage - a few words about the week's parashat from one of the community members and Beit Tefilla staff. And just as their faces are different, so are their opinions - we will wait to read the personal interpretation and learn what the encounter with the parashat brings up in them.

פרשת ויקרא

Parashat Vayikra

On the Distinction Between Compassionate Sacrifice and Immoral Sacrifice by Rani Yeger

פרשת צו

Parashat Tzav

Rivi Dror on the Tzav Affair: A Light That Does Not Consume: Starting Over in the Midst of a Burning Reality

שבת חוה"מ פסח

Shabbat Chol HaMoed Pesach

On the Connection Between Passover and Song of Songs – Rabbi Esteban Gottfried

פרשת שמיני

Parashat Shemini

Parashat Shemini: Between Responsibility and Guilt – Leadership in Times of Crisis. By Ronen Keller

פרשת תזריע מצורע

Parashat Tazria-Metzora

Dr. Esti Doron on the Parshat Tazria-Metzora: The path to closeness sometimes goes through distance, stopping, and a process of return.

פרשת אחרי מות- קדושים

Parashat Acharei Mot–Kedoshim

"and the land will not vomit you out"
Yaakov Castel on the Parshat Acharei Mot-Kedoshim

פרשת אמור

Parshat Emor

Parashat Emor – Bringing holiness into the reality of our lives.

פרשת בהר- בחוקותי

Parshat Behar-Bechukotai

"And your brother shall live with you" – On mental health in the weekly Torah portion"
Rabbi Kobi Weiss on Parshat Behar-Bechukotai

Parashat Vayikra

Words for Shabbat - A community blog for this week's parashah

Parashat Vayikra

Leviticus - Thoughts on Sacrifice

 
By Rani Jaeger
 

And the LORD called to Moses and spoke to him from the tent of meeting, saying:
Speak to the children of Israel, and say to them: When any of you bring an offering to the Lord, you shall bring your offering of livestock: of cattle and of sheep.
The Lord called to Moses and spoke to him from the tent of meeting, saying,

 

As a rabbi preparing boys and girls for their bar mitzvah, the Book of Leviticus presents an immense challenge for writing a sermon. The reason is simple: from the first portion and throughout the entire book, entire chapters are dedicated to the laws of sacrifices – among the most difficult subjects for contemporary Jews to grapple with, and a Jewish practice that has not been observed for nearly two thousand years since the destruction of the Temple.


The question of what to do with entire portions of the Torah that are read and have no (and perhaps it's good they have no...) connection to reality – let's set that aside for another discussion. But if ritual sacrifice is not part of our lives – the word "korban," in its many meanings, is very much present!


Prof. Moshe Halbertal, known to many of us and from whom I had the privilege to study, dedicated an entire book (in English) to the concept of the sacrifice. In several interviews conducted around the book's publication, Halbertal presented the findings of his research regarding the 'biography" of the word: "The first meaning of the word "korban' is the biblical meaning, and it is - 'korban,' in the sense of 'to bring near',' its parallel being the mincha (offering). Just as one "brings near" a korban, one "places" a mincha. The korban is a gift, but it is a gift whose transfer from the giver's hand to the receiver's hand is not guaranteed. Therefore, you only "bring near," because you don't know if the korban will be accepted or not.


The second meaning is 'victim' – the victim of rape, the victim of murder. It's an interesting question what connects these two meanings. I think it's related to the fact that the biblical sacrifice is a sacrifice with innocence. The animal must be pure, innocent, in order to be sacrificed. The modern Hebrew sacrifice is also innocent. But this is a very late meaning, which only begins to appear at the beginning of the 20th century; when Jews were massacred in pogroms in the Middle Ages, they were not called 'sacrifices'...


The third meaning, which is also very late in Hebrew, is the meaning of 'to sacrifice for': 'I sacrificed for my children,' for example, or 'I sacrificed my life for a certain cause.'" In interviews with him, Halbertal warns that in our time – within the concept of sacrifice lies also a dangerous mechanism of reversing affinity, meaning, a situation where the value does not justify the sacrifice, but rather the sacrifice sanctifies the value; instead of sacrificing for something holy, the act of sacrifice itself makes the goal holy and immune to criticism.


This process can create a "license" for violence, where the aggressor perceives themselves as a victim and thereby frees themselves from the shackles of conscience. From this perspective, even the binding of Isaac can be seen not only as a story of faith but as a moment where the victim of conscience turns the sacrificer into a captive within the cycle of power and aggression of his faith.


I find Habertas's analysis illuminating: identifying the three layers of the concept of "sacrifice" – the ritual act, the innocent victim, and the altruistic sacrifice – allows us to re-examine the rituals and values that shape our lives. The transition from "sacrificing to…" to "sacrificing…" is the junction where it is determined whether sacrifice is a path to closeness and connection, or if it is a tool to justify power and violence.
This understanding is especially crucial for us today, as we seek to establish a Jewish and Israeli identity that does not sink into an all-permissive victim consciousness, but rather one that aspires to action characterized by responsibility and morality. This is how the Hebrew language and the portion have brought us back to a concept that is not only not confined to the distant past, but the opposite: the concept at the heart of the portion clearly presents us with the sharpness of the choice before us and the magnitude of the challenge in shaping our lives. This may be the great call of "Vayikra.".


Shabbat Shalom!

Picture of רני יגר

Rani Jaeger

Rabbi Dr. Rani Jaeger, co-founder and co-rabbi at Beit Tefila Israeli, directs the Ritual Center and is a research fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute. He is a father of four and a new grandfather.

Parashat Vayakhel-Pekudei

Words for Shabbat - A community blog for this week's parashah

Parashat Vayakhel-Pekudei

The Tent of Meeting as the perfection of peace

 
By Rebecca Bakalash
 

The parashah 'Vayakhel' begins with the words:
"And Moses gathered the All the congregation of the children of Israel, and said unto them, These are the words which the Lord hath commanded, that ye should do them' (Exodus 35:1), and later it is said again, "And Moses said unto the children of Israel, Build ye unto me a sanctuary, that I may dwell among them" (Exodus 25:42). All The congregation of the children of Israel, as it is written (Leviticus 4).
The word All She plays a leading role in the story, teaching us that the entire community of Israel, men and women alike, took part in building the Tabernacle. Everyone contributed, and everyone worked on the project.


These words are written on the afternoon of Purim. Last night we read the Book of Esther, in which Esther also asks
From Mordechai, "Go gather the All The Jews who are in Shushan.".

commandments The audience and the gathering, emphasizing Everything In both cases, during the inauguration of the Tabernacle and in times of trouble and distress, we are taught about the importance of unity and cohesion and the danger of division and fragmentation. "And Haman said to King Ahasuerus, "There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among the peoples in all the provinces of your kingdom. Haman the Agagite, of the seed of Amalek, points out the The separation As a sign that he would be able to defeat Mordechai and his people.


Even in the description of the Tabernacle, the Tent of Meeting, after the detailed description of all the various materials and the multitude of parts and tools, their descriptions and measurements, the text returns and mentions twice the cohesion and completeness of all the parts.
.(The Tabernacle. "To connect the tent to be one" (Luke 19 ). "And the tabernacle was one"(Luke 13).


The Tabernacle vessels symbolize the union of opposites. to unite The United:
A special commandment was given regarding the menorah of the Tabernacle: "He shall make the menorah of pure gold" (37:17). "Three branches of the menorah shall be on one side, and three branches of the menorah shall be on the other side" (37:18). "Its stems, its bowls, its knobs, and its flowers shall be of one piece with it" (37:17). "It shall be made of pure gold, hammered work" (Exodus 37:22).


The union of opposites is also reflected in the priestly garments, particularly the sash and the ephod. They are made of shatnez, a mixture of wool and linen, with special permission from the Torah, during Temple service.

The unification of opposites also characterizes the breastplate. Twelve stones, each stone unique "And the stones shall be according to the names of the children of Israel: twelve according to their names, engraved like the engravings of a signet, each according to his name, for the twelve tribes" (Leviticus 39:14). All twelve stones, symbolizing the twelve tribes, are united on the square of the breastplate.
The symbolic meaning of the union of opposites in the breastplate and staffs, the rods of the menorah, in the national context, is an expression of unity with Israel in all its diversity and colors.


"This is the essence of perfect peace.
Strive for peace
Between two extremes.". 
Rabbi Nachman of Breslov
Abbreviation of Likutei Moharan, letter A.


The parashah "Vayakhel" opens with the first commandment, "Six days you shall do work, but on the seventh day you shall have a holy sabbath" (Leviticus 24:31). After this first commandment, there is a transition back to the work of building the Tabernacle, a kind of parallel between the six days of God's creation of the universe, the six days of work, and the work of building the Tabernacle.

 

The words "and God finished" and "work" appear at the end of God's creation of the world."And he finished God finished His work on the seventh day (Genesis 2:2), and with the completion of the Tabernacle, "And he finished Moses completed the work" (Exodus 33). Both works end with a blessing, "And God blessed them" (Genesis 1:28), "And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it" (Genesis 2:3). In the portion of Hakhel, upon completion of the Tabernacle, 'And Moses saw all the work, and behold, they had done it as the Lord had commanded, and Moses blessed them' (Exodus 39:43).
According to the Sages, the blessing included a special prayer that the Shechina would dwell in their work and that the Tabernacle would be stable and permanent.

 

The founding physicist, Isaac Newton, saw in the Temple an accurate physical model of the universe and the heliocentric solar system. In his view, the structure of the Temple contained the dimensions of the universe and was built with divine inspiration.
The parts of the temple conceal ancient wisdom about the structure of the cosmos. The altar in the center represents the sun, and the entire temple reflects divine order and physical harmony, what Newton called 'the divine plan.'.
This concept also applies to the structure of the Tabernacle and its vessels, which were built according to the instructions of the "divine plan,' 'as He showed you on the mountain" (Exodus 27:8), a divine instruction to Moses to build the Tabernacle and its vessels exactly according to the pattern presented to him on Mount Sinai.

 

The Haftarah for the portion of Hakhel deals with the construction of the Temple vessels in parallel to the construction of the Tabernacle in the portion. It describes in detail the construction of the Temple pillars, until 'and they finished the work of the pillars' (I Kings 7:22). These are the pillars "Yakin," the right pillar, and 'Boaz,' the left pillar. The pillars 'Yakin' and 'Boaz' are the 'foundation pillars' of the Temple and of the existence of the Jewish people.

 

And if we are wise,
All The people,
To establish (from the word "prepare") unity,
"The Lord will give strength (from the word bo-az) to His people,
May God bless His people.
Peace be with you.".
(Psalms 29:11)

Picture of רבקה בקלש

By Rebecca Bakalash

"The helper opposite" Reuven "The helper opposite me," mother of three and happy grandmother of seven. Doctor of Intertextual Art and Visual Culture.

Parashat Ki Tissa

Words for Shabbat - A community blog for this week's parashah

Parashat Ki Tissa

What happens when the leader disappears?

 
By Meir Tzohar
 

The "Because you will carry" It is one of the most dramatic in the Torah, ranging from spiritual exaltation to the depths of the sin of the golden calf. The order of events is not chronological (the census takes place only a year later in the Book of Numbers).

The parashah opens with a census, conducted by means of a uniform contribution of half a shekel, which will be used to build the Tabernacle. It then details some of the Tabernacle's vessels and appoints craftsmen to carry out the work. Further details on the commandments of Shabbat complete the opening of the parashah (with the linking of the commandments of Shabbat to the construction of the Tabernacle serving as the traditional interpretation for the formulation of the list of 39 types of work prohibited on Shabbat). 

The main part of the passage deals with "The sin of the golden calf" – the original sin of Israeli/Jewish culture for thousands of years. Moses delays on the mountain for 40 days. The people, under pressure and anxiety, demand a replacement for Aaron. Aaron creates the The Golden Calf. God informs Moses of the sin and wants to destroy the people. Moses prays for the people, but when he comes down and sees the dancing around the calf, he Breaks the tablets of the covenant. Moses punishes the sinners with the help of the Levites, who pass through the camp and kill 3,000 people. Afterward, Moses climbs the mountain again to ask for forgiveness. He asks God, "Please show me your glory." In response, God reveals to him the The Thirteen Attributes of Mercy , the main prayer for asking forgiveness to this day.

 

Moses carves new stone tablets. After another 40 days, he comes down with The second tablets. Due to his immense closeness to God, Moses' face is glowing The light was so strong that he had to put a veil over his face when he spoke to the people (statues of Moses with horns throughout Europe originate from a faulty translation). 

 

From "We will do and we will hear" to "The sin of the golden calf"

The connection between "We will do and we will hear" and the sin of the golden calf seems, at first glance, to be a complete contradiction. How could a people that had reached a spiritual state of self-nullification ("We will do" before "We will hear") crash and burn within forty days into idolatry of a golden calf? However, when we look at the psychological sequence of events, we can see in the sin of the golden calf Direct continuation The extremism of "we will do and we will hear," and an ancient expression of FOMO, the fear of missing out.

"We will do and we will hear" – spiritual ecstasy without preparation

The mass cry"We will do and we will hear." expresses a state of ecstasy. The Israelites gave up intellectual understanding and critical thinking ("we will hear") in favor of total commitment ("we will do"). It is a moment of spiritual "high" in which the boundaries between man and his beliefs become blurred, and man loses control.

 

The challenge:  Peak moments pass quickly. As soon as Moses ascended the mountain and the fog took over, the people were left in a vacuum of faith. Without the "hearing"—that is, without deep understanding, critical thinking, a gradual process, and tools to contain the spiritual experience in everyday life—enthusiasm quickly turns to anxiety. When Moses was "late" in coming down, the emptiness turned to fear, and the people sought a security blanket.

 

The sin of the golden calf FOMO   collective

FOMO is the fear that something important is happening and we are not part of it, or that the source of our security/happiness has disappeared and we have been left behind. After 40 days, the people develop a "film" of anxieties and fears:

The fear of losing the leader: "For this is Moses the man... we did not know what had become of him." The people are afraid that their connection with God has been severed and that they are "missing out" on the opportunity to continue the experience of Sinai.

The need for "here and now"":  FOMO requires quick solutions. The calf was not an attempt to rebel against God, but an attempt moor The same in substance. The people need "a God who will go before us"—a God who can be seen with the eyes, who is available and immediate, who does not require waiting in the fog.

Social pressure: As on social media, the anxiety surrounding the sin of the golden calf feeds on itself. "And the people gathered around Aaron" – this is a movement stemming from social pressure and mass anxiety that "everyone knows something I don't know" about Moses' disappearance.

 

Dealing with the FOMO – Building a "safe place" for anxiety

 

The sin of the golden calf teaches us that we cannot live only by "we will do and we will hear," by moments of peak emotion and blind faith, without building everyday tools. The calf is "Shortcut" To achieve a sense of "divinity" without going through the work, the waiting, and the uncertainty. The Tabernacle is a correction – Unlike the calf, which was created in a moment of outburst and anxiety, the Tabernacle was built with detail, painstaking work, and planning. It teaches that the way to deal with spiritual FOMO is not by chasing instant gratification, but by creating a routine of sacred work.

 

The second tablets Moshe's sculptures reinforce the motif of Sisyphean labor versus religious and spiritual ecstasy. The most significant difference between the panels is their origin. The first panels were """The work of God is the letter, and the letter is the work of God.""". They represent a gift from heaven, a total experience that requires no human effort—like the initial "We will do and we will hear." In contrast, in the second set of tablets, God commands Moses""" Carve two stone tablets like the first ones.""" . Here, Moses is the one who must carve the stone, and God "only" writes on them. 

 

The first boards were like a perfect "story," everything looked amazing and effortless—  "We will do and we will hear.". The second tablets are a correction—they teach that holiness requires Hard work and genuine involvement. We cannot rely solely on divine ecstasy; we must carve out the tools ourselves so that we do not fall apart in every moment of anxiety and difficulty.

 

In the Midrash Exodus Rabbah, it is recounted that Moses regretted breaking the first tablets, but the Holy One, blessed be He, comforted him, saying, "Do not regret the first ones, for they contained only the Ten Commandments, but in the second tablets I give you more than that." Halakhot, Midrash, and Aggadah"Here too, the Midrash teaches that it was precisely the breaking and repairing that gave rise to a new depth – theOral Torah. FOMO seeks the quick answer, but the second boards represent the longer, more interpretive, and richer path that develops alongside the individual. 

 

The Gemara in Bava Batra (14b) notes that both the complete tablets and the broken tablets were placed inside the Ark. """broken slabs """Asher Shiber Moshe. From this we can learn that profound correction does not ignore situations of brokenness. Correction does not mean ignoring failure, but rather making room for brokenness. Brokenness reminds us that even failures (such as the sin of the golden calf) have value. Failure is part of the story. The attempt to be "perfect" (as in the first tablets) is what causes anxiety and leads to brokenness. Accepting brokenness allows us to cope and grow. 

Summary

The sin of the golden calf is the story of a people who rose too quickly and too high in "We will do and we will hear.", and were unable to cope when their leader disappeared. The fear of being left alone in the fog without a tangible God drove them to create a glittering substitute in the form of the golden calf. And so today, we too must remember that it is precisely in moments of uncertainty, crisis, and difficulty, when we feel that we are "missing out" or being left behind, that the wise thing to do is not to run after shiny, fast-moving "golden calves," but to patiently build up inner strength that will carry us even when the fog covers the mountain.

Picture of מאיר צהר

Meir Tzohar

Meir Tzohar - eternal student... Vered's other half, father to three grown children and grandfather to four amazing grandchildren and Polymath...